visitor (0 QPoints)
  • FR
  • EN
  • NL
  • DE
  • ES
315 experts, 1193 registered users, 1659 questions already answered
European Experts Exchange, the very best site for high-quality IT solutions

New Improved Search!

 


05/10/2011 1h30 : Steve Jobs is dead, the father of Apple ][ is gone, we are all orphaned.

Algorithms :: Statistics :: comparing 2 experimentally determined means


By: pdanese U.S.A.  Date: 19/09/2003 00:00:00  English  Points: 125 Status: Answered
Quality : Excellent
let's say i perform 2 measurements under condition X, and my average measurement for condition X turns out to be 100 with an estimated standard deviation of 7.

let's say i perform 2 more measurements under condition Y, and under this condition my average measurement turns out to be 70, with an estimated standard deviation of 11.

finally, let's say i perform 2 more measurements under condition Z, and under this condition my average measurement turns out to be 26 with an estimated standard deviation of 5.

Is there a way of expressing the likelihood that the true mean under condition Y is different than the true mean under condition X?
Same Question when comparing the means observed under condition Z to those under condition X.

How does one generalize this to more than 2 measurements?

Thank you for any information you can provide!
By: aburr Date: 20/09/2003 17:34:00 English  Type : Answer
The quick and somewhat dirty way of detecting differences is to use 3 times the standard deviation. If everything is normally distributed, two values which differ by three sds have a 99% chance of being different. In your case measurement Y has such a large sd that little can be concluded about what it represents. However it is abundantly clear that measurement Z differs from measurement X.
The above can be extended to many more measurements that two. Indeed it is hard to get a useful sd from just two meaurements.
By: VGR Date: 22/09/2003 06:59:00 English  Type : Assist
welcome in the wonderful land of "experience plans" :D

Also, the laws followed by "means of means" are known and there are tests designed for them
By: rfr1tz Date: 24/09/2003 04:27:00 English  Type : Assist
This is completely from memory, but this is a standard problem that is in every elementary statistics book.

X: mean = 100 s.d. = 7    variance = 49
Y: mean = 70   s.d. = 11  variance = 121

So add up the variances to get the variance of X-Y = 170  implies s.d. = 13.

So then you have to look up in a book to see what the probability that X and Y are equal. In this case, it's 30/13 = 2.3 standard deviations. Look that up in a table. It's not very likely. Probably 1 or 2 %.
By: VGR Date: 24/09/2003 04:56:00 English  Type : Comment
more than that

(from memory ttoo :D )

1 sigma = 66%
2 sigma = 90%
3 sigma = 99%
By: alexcvt Date: 30/09/2003 08:34:00 English  Type : Comment
Google for "confidence intervals"
By: VGR Date: 30/09/2003 14:50:00 English  Type : Assist
absolutely, but it depeds on th test used, ie on the law underlying
By: rfr1tz Date: 06/10/2003 00:29:00 English  Type : Comment
VGR - It's 68%, 95%, 99.7% but I'm thinking it's a one-tailed test, so the perecentages might have to be halfed!?
By: VGR Date: 06/10/2003 02:13:00 English  Type : Comment
mine were for two-tail

but I can make memory errors (GPFs ;-)

Do register to be able to answer

EContact
browser fav
page generated in 352.540970 milliseconds

Why Google AdSense ads ?

compteur
 Ranking-Hits PageRank for this page