Algorithms :: Statistics :: comparing 2 experimentally determined means |
|||
| By: pdanese |
Date: 19/09/2003 00:00:00 |
Points: 125 | Status: Answered Quality : Excellent |
|
let's say i perform 2 measurements under condition X, and my average measurement for condition X turns out to be 100 with an estimated standard deviation of 7. let's say i perform 2 more measurements under condition Y, and under this condition my average measurement turns out to be 70, with an estimated standard deviation of 11. finally, let's say i perform 2 more measurements under condition Z, and under this condition my average measurement turns out to be 26 with an estimated standard deviation of 5. Is there a way of expressing the likelihood that the true mean under condition Y is different than the true mean under condition X? Same Question when comparing the means observed under condition Z to those under condition X. How does one generalize this to more than 2 measurements? Thank you for any information you can provide! |
|||
| By: aburr | Date: 20/09/2003 17:34:00 | Type : Answer |
|
| The quick and somewhat dirty way of detecting differences is to use 3 times the standard deviation. If everything is normally distributed, two values which differ by three sds have a 99% chance of being different. In your case measurement Y has such a large sd that little can be concluded about what it represents. However it is abundantly clear that measurement Z differs from measurement X. The above can be extended to many more measurements that two. Indeed it is hard to get a useful sd from just two meaurements. |
|||
| By: VGR | Date: 22/09/2003 06:59:00 | Type : Assist |
|
| welcome in the wonderful land of "experience plans" :D Also, the laws followed by "means of means" are known and there are tests designed for them |
|||
| By: rfr1tz | Date: 24/09/2003 04:27:00 | Type : Assist |
|
| This is completely from memory, but this is a standard problem that is in every elementary statistics book. X: mean = 100 s.d. = 7 variance = 49 Y: mean = 70 s.d. = 11 variance = 121 So add up the variances to get the variance of X-Y = 170 implies s.d. = 13. So then you have to look up in a book to see what the probability that X and Y are equal. In this case, it's 30/13 = 2.3 standard deviations. Look that up in a table. It's not very likely. Probably 1 or 2 %. |
|||
| By: VGR | Date: 24/09/2003 04:56:00 | Type : Comment |
|
| more than that (from memory ttoo :D ) 1 sigma = 66% 2 sigma = 90% 3 sigma = 99% |
|||
| By: alexcvt | Date: 30/09/2003 08:34:00 | Type : Comment |
|
| Google for "confidence intervals" |
|||
| By: VGR | Date: 30/09/2003 14:50:00 | Type : Assist |
|
| absolutely, but it depeds on th test used, ie on the law underlying |
|||
| By: rfr1tz | Date: 06/10/2003 00:29:00 | Type : Comment |
|
| VGR - It's 68%, 95%, 99.7% but I'm thinking it's a one-tailed test, so the perecentages might have to be halfed!? |
|||
| By: VGR | Date: 06/10/2003 02:13:00 | Type : Comment |
|
| mine were for two-tail but I can make memory errors (GPFs ;-) |
|||
|
Do register to be able to answer |
|||
©2010 These pages are served without commercial sponsorship. (No popup ads, etc...). Bandwidth abuse increases hosting cost forcing sponsorship or shutdown. This server aggressively defends against automated copying for any reason including offline viewing, duplication, etc... Please respect this requirement and DO NOT RIP THIS SITE.
Please DO link to this page!








